The Anti-Federalist Papers

During the period of debate over the ratification of the Constitution, numerous independent local speeches and articles were published all across the country. Initially, many of the articles in opposition were written under pseudonyms, such as "Brutus", "Centinel", and "Federal Farmer". Eventually, famous revolutionary figures such as Patrick Henry came out publicly against the Constitution. They argued that the strong national government proposed by the Federalists was a threat to the rights of individuals and that the President would become a king. They objected to the federal court system created by the proposed constitution. This produced a phenomenal body of political writing; the best and most influential of these articles and speeches were gathered by historians into a collection known as the Anti-Federalist Papers in allusion to the Federalist Papers.

By : Patrick Henry (1736 - 1799)

01 - Centinel I



02 - Centinel XI



03 - Federal Farmer I



04 - Federal Farmer II



05 - Federal Farmer III



06 - Federal Farmer IV



07 - Federal Farmer V



08 - Federal Farmer VI



09 - Federal Farmer VII



10 - Federal Farmer VIII



11 - Federal Farmer IX



12 - Federal Farmer X



13 - Federal Farmer XI



14 - Federal Farmer XII



15 - Federal Farmer XIII



16 - Federal Farmer XIV



17 - Federal Farmer XV



18 - Federal Farmer XVI



19 - Federal Farmer XVII



20 - Federal Farmer XVIII



21 - Brutus I



22 - Brutus II



23 - Brutus III



24 - Brutus IV



25 - Brutus V



26 - Brutus VI



27 - Brutus VII



28 - Brutus VIII



29 - Brutus IX



30 - Brutus X



31 - Brutus XI



32 - Brutus XII



33 - Brutus XIII



34 - Brutus XIV



35 - Brutus XV



36 - Brutus XVI



37 - John DeWitt I



38 - John DeWitt II



39 - John Dewitt III



40 - Cato III



41 - Cato IV



42 - Cato V



43 - Cato VII



44 - Agrippa VI



45 - Agrippa VII



46 - Agrippa VIII



47 - Agrippa IX



48 - Penn Minority



49 - Impartial Examiner I



50 - Impartial Examiner II



51 - Impartial Examiner III



52 - Maryland Farmer IV



53 - Maryland Farmer V



54 - Patrick Henry, 5 June 1788



55 - Patrick Henry, 7 June 1788



56 - Patrick Henry, 9 June 1788


The Anti-Federalist papers were written over a number of years and by a variety of authors who utilized pen names to remain anonymous, and debates over authorship continue to this day. Unlike the authors of The Federalist Papers, a group of three men working closely together, the authors of the anti-Federalist papers were not engaged in an organized project. Thus, in contrast to the pro-Constitution advocates, there was no one book or collection of anti-Federalist Papers at the time. The essays were the product of a vast number of authors, working individually rather than as a group. Although there is no canonical list of anti-federalist authors, major authors include Cato (likely George Clinton), Brutus (likely Melancton Smith or Robert Yates or perhaps John Williams), Centinel (Samuel Bryan), and the Federal Farmer (either Melancton Smith, Richard Henry Lee, or Mercy Otis Warren). Works by Patrick Henry and a variety of others are often included as well.

Until the mid-20th century, there was no united series of anti-Federalist papers. The first major collection was compiled by Morton Borden, a professor at Columbia University, in 1965. He "collected 85 of the most significant papers and arranged them in an order closely resembling that of the 85 Federalist Papers". The most frequently cited contemporary collection, The Complete Anti-Federalist, was compiled by Herbert Storing and Murray Dry of the University of Chicago. At seven volumes and including many pamphlets and other materials not previously published in a collection, this work is considered, by many, to be the authoritative compendium on the publications.

Considering their number and diversity, it is difficult to summarize the contents of the Anti-Federalist papers. Generally speaking they reflected the sentiments of the anti-Federalists, which Akhil Reed Amar of the Yale Law School generalized as: a localist fear of a powerful central government, a belief in the necessity of direct citizen participation in democracy, and a distrust of wealthy merchants and industrialists. Essays with titles such as "A Dangerous Plan of Benefit Only to The 'Aristocratick Combination'" and "New Constitution Creates a National Government; Will Not Abate Foreign Influence; Dangers of Civil War And Despotism" fill the collection, and reflect the strong feelings of the authors.

Comments

Random Post