The Art of Controversy

The Art of Controversy (or The Art of Being Right) is a short treatise written by the German philosopher Arthur Schopenhauer in which he presents thirty-eight methods of gaining an unfair advantage in a debate and thereby being right even if you are wrong. Schopenhauer champions the virtue of dialectical argument, in his view wrongly neglected by philosophers in favour of logic, and goes on to discuss the distinction between our conscious intellectual powers and our will. The text is a favourite of debaters including the philosophers AC Grayling and Mary Warnock, and the Mayor of London Boris Johnson.

By : Arthur Schopenhauer (1788 - 1860), translated by T. Bailey Saunders (1860 - 1928)

01 - Preliminary: Logic and Dialectic



02 - The Basis of All Dialectic



03 - Strategems 1 to 10



04 - Stratagems 11 to 20



05 - Strategems 21 to 30



06 - Strategems 31 to 38



07 - On the Comparative Place of Interest and Beauty in Works of Art



08 - Psychological Observations



09 - On the Wisdom of Life: Aphorisms



10 - Genius and Virtue


By the ancients, Logic and Dialectic were used as synonymous terms; although logizesthai, "to think over, to consider, to calculate," and dialegesthai, "to converse," are two very different things.

The name Dialectic was, as we are informed by Diogenes Laertius, first used by Plato; and in the Phaedrus, Sophist, Republic, bk. vii., and elsewhere, we find that by Dialectic he means the regular employment of the reason, and skill in the practice of it. Aristotle also uses the word in this sense; but, according to Laurentius Valla, he was the first to use Logic too in a similar way. Dialectic, therefore, seems to be an older word than Logic. Cicero and Quintilian use the words in the same general signification.

This use of the words as synonymous terms lasted through the Middle Ages into modern times; in fact, until the present day. But more recently, and in particular by Kant, Dialectic has often been employed in a bad sense, as meaning "the art of sophistical controversy"; and hence Logic has been preferred, as of the two the more innocent designation. Nevertheless, both originally meant the same thing; and in the last few years they have again been recognised as synonymous.

It is a pity that the words have thus been used from of old, and that I am not quite at liberty to distinguish their meanings. Otherwise, I should have preferred to define Logic (from logos, "word" and "reason," which are inseparable) as "the science of the laws of thought, that is, of the method of reason"; and Dialectic (from dialegesthai, "to converse" - and every conversation communicates either facts or opinions, that is to say, it is historical or deliberative) as "the art of disputation," in the modern sense of the word. It is clear, then, that Logic deals with a subject of a purely à priori character, separable in definition from experience, namely, the laws of thought, the process of reason or the logos; the laws, that is, which reason follows when it is left to itself and not hindered, as in the case of solitary thought on the part of a rational being who is in no way misled. Dialectic, on the other hand, would treat of the intercourse between two rational beings who, because they are rational, ought to think in common, but who, as soon as they cease to agree like two clocks keeping exactly the same time, create a disputation, or intellectual contest. Regarded as purely rational beings, the individuals would, I say, necessarily be in agreement, and their variation springs from the difference essential to individuality; in other words, it is drawn from experience.

Logic, therefore, as the science of thought, or the science of the process of pure reason, should be capable of being constructed à priori. Dialectic, for the most part, can be constructed only à posteriori; that is to say, we may learn its rules by an experiential knowledge of the disturbance which pure thought suffers through the difference of individuality manifested in the intercourse between two rational beings, and also by acquaintance with the means which disputants adopt in order to make good against one another their own individual thought, and to show that it is pure and objective. For human nature is such that if A. and B. are engaged in thinking in common, and are communicating their opinions to one another on any subject, so long as it is not a mere fact of history, and A. perceives that B.'s thoughts on one end the same subject are not the same as his own, he does not begin by revising his own process of thinking, so as to discover any mistake which he may have made, but he assumes that the mistake has occurred in B.'s. In other words, man is naturally obstinate; and this quality in him is attended with certain results, treated of in the branch of knowledge which I should like to call Dialectic, but which, in order to avoid misunderstanding, I shall call Controversial or Eristical Dialectic. Accordingly, it is the branch of knowledge which treats of the obstinacy natural to man.

Eristic is only a harsher name for the same thing.

Comments

Random Post

  • Câu chuyện của Kreacher |Chương 10| Harry Potter và Bảo bối Tử thần | Tập 7
    20.10.2023 - 0 Comments
    “Kreacher đã làm sai. Kreacher đã không thực hiện được mệnh lệnh của cậu chủ.”- Kreacher nói về mệnh lệnh…
  • Pélerinage d'un nommé Chrétien
    16.08.2019 - 0 Comments
    Le pélerinage d'un nommé Chrétien est un roman allégorique de John Bunyan, publié en 1678. L'auteur rédigea…
  • Esaú e Jacó
    09.10.2019 - 0 Comments
    Esaú e Jacó é o penúltimo livro de Machado de Assis, lançado em 1904. No título do livro, o autor remete à…
  • The House of Whispers
    21.06.2021 - 0 Comments
    This is a story about a young lady and her blind father who live in a House of Whispers. "There is a legend…
  • Cowboy Songs and Other Frontier Ballads
    01.06.2021 - 0 Comments
    John Avery Lomax is a towering figure in the field of early American musicology and folklore. Through…
  • The $30,000 Bequest and Other Stories
    14.11.2019 - 0 Comments
    The $30,000 Bequest and Other Stories (1906) is a collection of thirty comic short stories by the American…
  • The Life of Oscar Wilde
    09.05.2021 - 0 Comments
    Robert Sherard was Oscar Wilde's friend of 20 years and first biographer. The Life of Oscar Wilde was the…
  • Wappin' Wharf, A Frightful Comedy of Pirates
    18.04.2021 - 0 Comments
    Our scene is the wind-swept coast of Devon. By day there is a wide stretch of ocean far below, and the…
  • Sói và ngựa - truyện cổ tích '' Ngụ Ngôn''
    23.10.2023 - 0 Comments
    Vào một ngày trời đẹp, chú ngựa và sói đang ung dung đứng trên đồi cỏ xanh lộng gió. Chú ngoe nguẩy cái đuôi…
  • Người họ Liêu và Diêm Vương Truyện cổ tích Việt Nam
    24.10.2023 - 0 Comments
    Ngày ấy có dòng họ Liêu, không hiểu do nguyên cớ nào mà người trong họ thường bị nạn chết non. Bọn lính tráng…
  • Categories
    08.03.2020 - 0 Comments
    Categories is the first of Aristotle's six texts on logic which are collectively known as the Organon. In…
  • Finnish Legends
    22.11.2020 - 0 Comments
    One dark winter's day in the north of Finland, Father Mikko seeks shelter in an isolated cabin till a storm…
  • Pellucidar
    11.02.2020 - 0 Comments
    David Innes and his captive, a member of the reptilian Mahar master race of the interior world of…
  • Atlantic Classics
    05.04.2021 - 0 Comments
    The Atlantic was a popular periodical with a wide range of essays and stories. In an effort to remain…
  • Key to the Science of Theology
    14.03.2021 - 0 Comments
    The present is an age of progress, of change, of rapid advance, and of wonderful revolutions.The very…
  • The Importance of Being Earnest
    17.09.2019 - 0 Comments
    This is a solo recording of the play, meaning that all parts including stage directions are performed by…